View Single Post
Old 21-10-2015, 21:16   #40
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sales/Oversubscription/Customer Service

Quote:
Originally Posted by sollp View Post
Yes a point but they will and have to invest in all of the Access network, all of the network amps will have to be replaced for the Upstream and downstream for Docsis 3.1 otherwise they will not be able to progress. They have constantly been investing maybe not in the correct areas but i believe that maybe down to the fact that the Access network needs massive investment as it has vast areas of the original amps that have been in place since day 1 and these will not be able to provide the Downstream or upstream needed for Docsis 3.1 and the future.
In what way does this prevent splitting of nodes or force VM to try using extra downstream channels in lieu of splitting nodes, though?

Quote:
As for congestion i think there are many legacy factors,(and cash at present) holding this up, there are lots of reasons why they do not happen or are cancelled.
I thought there was massive investment going on?

I see on the forums another case of congestion going on for a year. 6 months to add new channels and, surprise surprise, having taken that long to do it it not being adequate so, apparently reluctantly, going on to splitting the node.

So it seems from what you've said that it's not about VM not having the money, more about them not being bothered enough about congestion on their network to prioritise resources towards relieving it.

Good to know.

---------- Post added at 22:16 ---------- Previous post was at 22:15 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
I'll let Igni repy to 3.0 and 3.1 can work together, he knows much more than me.
All 3.1 CPE can use 3.0 channels in addition to 3.1 channels. They contain both 3.0 and 3.1 modem chipsets.

3.0 CPE cannot use 3.1 channels for obvious reasons.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote