Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
---------- Post added at 16:00 ---------- Previous post was at 15:58 ----------
It would be worth it to Sky if the subscriptions they received outweighed the set up and maintenance costs, which of course they would. If it is worth it to have Now TV on the Roku, why not on the Tivo?
|
Given that a Now TV box costs fifteen quid and will be way faster than any implementation on Tivo, what is the point of adding it to Tivo?
And I know there is the 'want it all on one box' scenario, but if that is an issue, people could always replace their DVD/BLU-RAY player with an LG model that comes with Now TV, Netflix and Amazon Prime installed. The only caveat to that is that Amazon Prime is limited to stereo, which will only be an issue to those with surround equipment that decodes Dolby Digital+.