Thread: 50M Double Speeds or not?
View Single Post
Old 09-10-2015, 14:36   #28
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 48
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Double Speeds or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
It's a typical enterprise licensing model, but on consumer hardware. Which is weird.
It's the way it is now. VM pay for licenses on the line cards they use when they want to add more channels too. Makes sense to tie up the other side under licenses as well.

Hell everything seems to be tending towards a licensing/subscription model now.

---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
Perhaps but it's quite a clever way of doing it. It keeps Virgin's options open, they can deploy more channels and pay for the extra licensing, or they can deploy 3.1 hardware - whatever is more economical.
It wasn't VM's decision, that's how the kit comes.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote