Thread: General Oversubscribed areas?
View Single Post
Old 23-09-2015, 21:52   #96
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 48
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Oversubscribed areas?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
However VM do seem to disagree with you, if maximum speed isnt important than why are they doubling it? Their historical and current behaviour suggests maximum speed is "all" they care about.
I was writing in the context of capacity planning.

---------- Post added at 22:52 ---------- Previous post was at 22:50 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
Yet VM usually turn up last on every metric except download speeds... Upstream, jitter, packet loss, DNS, stability, shaping, bufferbloat, etc., pretty much everything measured by the Samknows box aside from download speeds.

Perhaps they should worry some more.
Many of those are due to the joys of DOCSIS. Packet loss I don't think they're the worst for though.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote