Quote:
Originally Posted by techguyone
I suppose that's one way to stop people from 'saying the wrong thing' just sue them to death.
I'll simply say,the poor kid would never have *gone missing/killed/abducted* if the MCCanns had been responsible parents and stayed with their children.
I wouldn't have thought I could have been sued for writing that as it is the truth.
I don't suppose anyone knows what happens to all this loot that they get from various sue sprees, does it go to Charity or a good cause? that would go down a lot better than if it wasn't.
|
It used to be common practice at holiday camps in the UK (eg Pontins) to have their staff listening out for crying children in the chalets, who would then contact parents who were at last getting a bit of relaxation.
It is all very well to criticise parents who do this sort of thing, but it has been pretty common practice over the years.
This 'holier than thou' attitude really isn't very helpful. We should all be concentrating on finding out the evil person who abducted this child and stop demonising the McCanns.
---------- Post added at 17:24 ---------- Previous post was at 17:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
Without a new lead a line should be drawn.
|
If all lines of inquiry are exhausted, unfortunately I must agree.
---------- Post added at 17:28 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
It is curious just how much time, money and effort is being directed at this sad case. I can't imagine 99.9% of other victims of child abduction are handled and resourced in the same manner and I have to ask why not?
|
H'mm. Maybe it would be better if the police re-directed their resources away from motorists and historic abuse cases into those areas that the public consider more important (eg burglaries)!