Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
Add, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Austria, Italy, Greece,.... widely varying degrees of comfort and welcome yes but 'safe', I'd say so when compared to what these people claim they're fleeing from.
I reckon that if countless thousands of migrants suddenly decided that the home towns and villages of those who support open doors were their preference they'd soon have a change of heart and be demanding
As it is, these migrants will not be or stay dispersed for long and we'll have no means by which to stop them going where they like. Watch the sentiment change when that happens - pity it'll be too late then...
|
Yet again, it's another sweeping generalisation with no actual factual basis at all!!
---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
To the nearest safe EU member state, yes. If that country cannot accept them then that government should have the responsibility of transferring them to another safe EU country, the location of which should be between the relevant governments and NOT just the choice of the refugee.
If you are desperate then you’ll accept the first safe country that will take you. If you refuse it then you’re making a choice.
France is a good example.
|
So, just to clarify... we are to let other member states of the EU struggle on their own until they can't manage before the next bordering country steps in to assist.?
Again, seems fair, the very definition and spirit of the word Union.