Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Sure I can be mistaken. But for you to automatically assume I am mistaken without any evidence makes you the problem here.
|
Calm down, I don't need to produce any evidence, I'm not bothered whether you believe me or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Says the iPhone owner defending his device? I'm not just a Samsung owner, as you can see above. However I'm being defensive because your only counter so far is to accuse me of ignorance when I ask you what you mean by "traditional Samsung lag".
I have never claimed your Samsung didn't lag yet every time I point out mine doesn't you imply I must be mistaken or ignorant.
|
If you say so. Read whatever you want to read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
I've asked you three times to point it out and/or detail it, you have still failed to do so; you continue arguing despite failing to come up with a single source or reference.
|
I have - my own experiences and from a few others in this thread but as I'm not bothered whether you believe me or not I don't need to produce anything more than that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Three times I've asked you to describe what you mean by "Traditional Samsung lag", your responses so far have been:
- "It doesn't happen on iPhone"
- "You're probably used to it if you've only used Samsungs. Try an iPhone"
- "Even if you've used other phones you can still be wrong or mistaken."
- "(a lot of) Samsung owners can't bare to have their precious devices criticised"
|
Fixed that for you so it says what I actually posted rather than you inventing things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
If that isn't fanboyism I don't know what is.
|
Including when in the past I've pointed out the iPhone limitations? Fanboyism would be if I'm against Androids altogether - I'm not. My issue is with Samsungs as you know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Meanwhile I'm still trying to figure out what you mean by "traditional Samsung lag" but it seems you're incapable of answering...
|
I've answered but because it's not what you're after you are simply ignoring it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
A quick Google search on iPhone lag, Blackberry lag, and Windows Phone lag shows it can be a problem too, but that still doesn't mean all these devices share "traditional lag". We know all devices have isolated cases of lag, but to call it traditional implies a systematic problem.
|
No, 'universal' would imply that but never mind, make things up as you go along eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Interestingly enough, there are:
0.8 million Google results for "Huawei lag" (9% market share)
9.2 million Google results for "Samsung lag" (21% market share)
82.3 million Google results for "iPhone lag" (14% market share)
By that reckoning iPhones have 14x times as much "traditional lag" as Samsungs do, while Samsungs lag 5x more often than Huawei's.
Course, scientifically speaking this "evidence" is paper thin but it's still more than Russ has bothered to post, which is amounts to "non-iPhone owners are mistaken"
|
For the 5th and final time, I am NOT interested in whether or not you believe me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
The upshot of the freedom you get on Android is some apps and manufacturers can do it badly, but Sony phones in particular are a lot better at managing it.
|
The first bit of sense you've posted in a long while.