[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Chris

Yes, we are "supposed" to believe it's true - because a jury of her peers heard the evidence and concluded that it was true. Given that she has been cleared in court of criminal behaviour, the rest of us really have no more to say on the matter.

As for whether she is competent and/or worth the money as a CEO, well that's a matter for her, Uncle Rupert and the shareholders.

Incidentally - I don't much care for her professionally; that, however, is by the by. I don't have to buy her product, and I don't.

Maybe she just had a good lawyer? I don't think being hired (again) by Murdoch is a ringing endorsement of her credibility, skills or morals. She will be judged on what she oversaw (or didn't) in her previous job and who she works for now.