Thread: dead within TWO WEEKS
View Single Post
Old 27-08-2015, 17:35   #17
cookie_365
Inactive
 
cookie_365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 2,583
cookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronze
cookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronzecookie_365 is cast in bronze
Re: dead within TWO WEEKS
Presumably a large proportion of these 2380 people who died did so shortly after eating biscuits. Or humming along to a tune on the radio.

Where's the control group? How likely was an otherwise identical person (in terms of health, disability, income etc) who wasn't 'flowed off' ESA to die? If there is a correlation, how do you know that's causation and not co-incidence, or a random peak in the stats, or if there's some other factor interacting with both?

I despise IDS and his 'reforms' but this is junk churnalism at its worst.
cookie_365 is offline   Reply With Quote