Thread: UFO BB
View Single Post
Old 26-08-2015, 17:47   #9
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: UFO BB

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq;35795246[url
http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/workspace/alcatel-lucent-bt-set-1-4tbs-fibre-bandwidth-record-136689[/url]

Yes, yes, I know. Multiple carriers, WDM, etc. is "cheating".
Aware of transmission technology going well beyond 100Gb at layer 1 over a single fibre, but the individual layer 2 links going across that will max out at 100Gb. 1Tb Ethernet isn't on the radar for right now.

Even way back when I was messing with ISP networks fibres carrying 96 x 10Gb wasn't infeasible, problem was all the kit to connect them to once they'd been dropped out of the mux.

Multiple carriers isn't cheating, it's absolutely necessary for 100Gb with the exception of 100GBASE-ZR
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote