View Single Post
Old 26-08-2015, 11:56   #104
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: FAQ on Virgin Media's WiFi Sharing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Springy View Post
In an ideal world, Virgin should give us a new router that is actually two separate hardware so even if it is exploitable, as they are not physically connected it does not matter if the public hardware is compromised.
Except all VM customers are "physically connected" to the same network in the end anyway, all that'll do is create a false sense of security (and double the amount of equipment to maintain)

---------- Post added at 11:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:54 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
Actually I'd be surprised if there was such a vulnerability. It's relatively trivial to completely separate two networks, the hard bit (that's prone to error) is when you try to create secure bridges between them.
I wonder if the Superhub will set up per-client L2TP tunnels to some VM server somewhere so all the access control can be done at the far end.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote