View Single Post
Old 13-08-2015, 09:10   #110
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Yet again - Cyclist Killed in London

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk View Post
Nope. There are dozens of opportunities for cyclists to proceed safely through red lights; all it takes is observation and common sense and if this is seen to be exercised the police turn a blind eye.
The trouble is that a lot of cyclists (and motorists as well) seem to lack the ability to observe and any common sense.

Personally I fail to see how allowing cyclists to ignore red lights makes things any safer for them or other road users. They can still hit pedestrians or motorists who do have a green light.

The problem is road users (and I count all road users in this, including pedestrians) are often not aware of what other road users are doing. That's what causes a lot of accidents, whether you are on foot, on a bike or in some sort of motorised vehicle.

I will be happy to be proved wrong, but I don't see how allowing cyclists to ignore red lights is going to do anything but make that worse.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote