Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
that may be so but I consider TP Link to be a cheapo naff brand which is why they are a higher spec price for price.
It is like getting a 20pk of McVities biscuits for £2 or a 50pk of Asda biscuits for the same price.
|
Not really, since they use the same internal components built in the same factory.
It's like getting a 20pk of McVities biscuits for £2 or a 20 pk of McVities biscuits for 50p but calling the latter "naff" because it's cheaper.
I'm sure you'll also consider PCs "cheapo naff" because they contain the same hardware as Macs at a lower price.
I consider anyone who pays more for exactly the same thing with a different logo on it to be either stupid or ignorant.
---------- Post added at 03:17 ---------- Previous post was at 03:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlos Carboni
Not quite... read this.
Clearly, the Tplink ain't your cup of tea for you to dunk your McVities biscuits.
Also, I was saying Archer 5 v1.6 (the one with the 3 Aerials) is the same hardware as Archer 7, read this |
I've told him to read
this several times but he prefers drinking his own kool-aid and believing a product is inherently better if it has his favourite company logo on it.
---------- Post added at 03:21 ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainmakerRaw
Because of DHCP overheads and NAT etc, generally you'll never get more than 96Mbps out of a 100Mbps NIC or switch.
|
Ermm there's no such thing as DHCP overheads and NAT doesn't exist on a NIC or a switch, are you sure you're not just picking random networking-related terms out of thin air?