View Single Post
Old 26-07-2015, 08:24   #31
Derek
Inactive
 
Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glasgow
Services: SkyHD and Broadband
Posts: 9,158
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Police in training for 'Mumbai-style' gun attack in UK

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...or-attack.html

Quote:
A top secret plan for the mass deployment of armed troops on the streets of Britain in the wake of a major terrorist attack can be revealed for the first time today.

More than 5,000 heavily armed soldiers would be sent to inner cities if Islamic State or other fanatics launched multiple attacks on British soil – an unprecedented military response to terrorism.
So a discreet glock on the hip or a yellow taser is bad but a soldier in full gear is good. Has the Home Secretary been at the chancellors secret stash?

Will the army have the same rules of engagement as the Police or be subject to murder trials ten years after any shootings? And how quickly could they be deployed in the event of an attack?

Anyway I thought the Police had enough resources to cope already and could cope with further cuts so why would the army be needed.
Derek is offline   Reply With Quote