View Single Post
Old 11-07-2015, 13:04   #5
Kushan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,737
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Re: 16QAM & 64QAM Interference

Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus View Post
although it seems like we have been waiting forever the upstream upgrades and channel bonding, I can see VM have been doing some work on the qt. For as long as I can remember upstream maintenance requests have always been qpsk and when I looked at my power level last week because of the heat, I noticed everything on upstream is now qam16.

Just checked again and very interestingly although I am still on 2 upstreams, one of them is qam64 and it defo wasn't last week. Things are looking up.

If they can get 3 bonded upstream channels on qam64 sorted before xmas then we will be in an excellent place for 300/20.
Interesting, I thought QAM16 was standard for quite some time now and qpsk was only used as a fallback.

My 2 upstreams are still both QAM16, sadly
Kushan is offline   Reply With Quote