Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
If you want to stop yourself looking a total idiot then read the post properly ,it is quite clear that "security is meaning secure tenancy ,I have no where said that I have a secure job ,I have for your benefit and the so others can see what a total plank you are quoted the post in question below
|
I'm quite happy to look an idiot and you can quite happily explain what you have written but that's not how I read it , I'm glad you decided to back track on what you meant and now it is clear I'm a plank for thinking you had the intelligence for a proper discussion without insults
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
What about the tens of thousands needed for deposits since the crash ,what about age ,it takes people years to save deposits but according to your rules they should leave the council house that is their home ,that they probably have children living in and going to the local school and move out to a private rent with no security all because you don't like the idea of someone in a council house doing as well as you in life .There is a name for people with your attitude ,just can't say it on a family forum
|
Agreed, it's just too difficult to leave the security of the Nanny which is why I agree with the proposed government plan , and only people like yourself have names for me with my attitude
, and just to add when these spongers (doing as well as myself as you say) are still paying their subsidised rent in 10 years I'll be happily mortgage free at the ripe old age of 47
, i know which situation I'd rather be in ......