Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
That is the most nonsensical statement ever
who do mean by saying "people who need them" do I not need a house ? do you need a house more than someone else ?
and the only thing that takes people off the streets is building more houses not forcing people to take out mortgages or private lets they cannot afford
|
Look. we're having a crisis. we have no money. Tesco's is even helping out trying to raise food for the UK.
if 'rich' people have money then they should be looking after themselves by supporting themselves in giving their council house to a person who can't afford to buy one. or as Osbourne says "pay full rent"
the poor helped out by giving up their 3 bedroomed or paying the tax on it.
the 'rich' are now having to do their part. we didn't expect the unemployed and on benefits to do al the hard work did we?
or did we?
---------- Post added at 13:48 ---------- Previous post was at 13:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
Why shouldn't he include this in those proposed cuts? I hope he does. I don't see why those at the bottom should be the only target.
It seems like people like yourself think you don't deserve to be part of the austerity cuts because you think you've earned the right not to be touched. But at the same time don't mind those that are struggling to be hit as long as it's not you.
It's like when child benefits cuts came in and the amount of concern voiced from those on £70,000 that kicked up a fuss.
As you say, without people like you.....
|
I always said that a lot of people only voted Conservatives because they thought Dave loved them
