Thread: 50M cable thickness
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2015, 11:31   #12
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: cable thickness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taf View Post
My electronics and radio telecomms training and experience tends to disbelieve that. Even aerial dipoles are made "thicker" to increase bandwidth.
Your electronics and radio telecoms training seems to have missed out some very basic principles then it seems, like higher order propagation modes.

http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee48...1Lecture10.pdf

Aerial dipoles are not made thicker to increase bandwidth.

---------- Post added at 10:30 ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy View Post
But a dipole isn't coax, the increased spacing between centre and shielding will reduce bandwidth but will also reduce attenuation but will increase power handling.
Exactly this. Thicker cables will carry higher frequencies and more power longer and further as long as those frequencies don't exceed the maximum cut-off frequency (i.e. bandwidth) of the cable .

---------- Post added at 10:31 ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
As I understand it those who know always rated girth over length to be honest.
Without girth, length would be impossible. But without length, the girth would be useless.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote