Thread: 50M cable thickness
View Single Post
Old 30-06-2015, 18:47   #4
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: cable thickness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taf View Post
In electrical wiring, thicker cables have higher bandwidths.
The exact opposite of the truth. Thicker cables have lower bandwidths. But they also have lower resistance and thus lower loss.

http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/coax

---------- Post added at 17:47 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by figgyburn View Post
hi,just noticed new billboards advertising virgins "cable thickness" compared to bt infinity's "cable thinness".pretty pathetic sexual innuendo regarding the images.very Frankie howard.Anyway does the thickness of cable make a difference as virgin are claiming as I would have thought bt would be using comparable quality cable just thinner.Just wondering.
I guess they got bored of yelling "fibre optic" when people wised up to the fact their competitors had just as much if not more "fibre optic".

In respect of broadband, it's the type of cable making the difference, not the thickness. Coaxial and twisted pair are completely different types of cables.

I haven't seen the ad but I suspect it'd fail to mention VM's "thicker" cable gets shared between *cough* hundreds of *cough* users.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote