Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Well, he had a White Power agenda.....
I think the point the poster is trying to make is that two lunatics attack a British soldier shouting 'Islam is Great', they are terrorists, but when a lunatic attacks an Asian shouting 'White Power', he is regarded as insane, or a 'lone wolf'...
|
I realised the point trying to be made but just don't think it relevant and find no use in distracting or detracting from the very real threat walking amongst us. If the anders brevicks or timothy mcveighs ever get together they might become the biggest threat but until then they aren't very important.
---------- Post added at 21:12 ---------- Previous post was at 21:09 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Also how about that guy who killed the church in America last week?
I don't think he did have connection to white supremacist organisations but then many Islamic extremists don't have direct links to equivalent organisations. Instead the theory goes that they get radicalised by the Internet and 'hate preachers' isn't it?
I don't see much difference between the church shooting and a conventional terrorist attack. It was inspired by an ideology, he wanted to start a race/civil war, he killed a lot of people.
|
And that theory gets exposed as false at every time, the guy that said he's daughters were radicalised on line in parliament was exposed attending hate rallies, the youngest suicide bomber was likewise groomed on line only for it to later emerge his brother is in a British prison for terrorist offences etc etc etc