[ianch99]

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=MBNL
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=th...+network+share
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/201...ork-share.html
http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/2010/...are-completed/
http://www.virginmediabusiness.co.uk...ves/2011/MBNL/
http://telecoms.com/149762/ericsson-...hared-network/




Commercial, unscientific testing by a US company vs independent tests by the UK government regulators, I know which one I'm more likely to believe. Not to mention your results do not quote actual speeds anywhere, only arbitrary "score" indexes, calculated from unknown figures and secret methodology they refuse to disclose.

http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/2014/3g-4g-bb-speeds/

Sharing mast sites does not equate to the same experience: different frequencies, backhaul networks, network management, etc.

Putting a pin in the map and checking the 3 and EE coverage from their own websites. Very, very different. Why so is these are the same network?

three.png

ee.png

I know what I believe ... what I see on my phone