Thread: A Duty To Die?
View Single Post
Old 20-05-2015, 15:43   #197
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: A Duty To Die?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
I personally think the German model would work better for us as a country, providing the funding required.
I'd be inclined to agree. The manner in which the NHS is funded is one no other democratic nation follows, and for good reason.

I think I have a history of preferring single payer insurance with private top-ups and co-pays on here. Brings in more private sector money which is, obviously, a good thing.

---------- Post added at 14:43 ---------- Previous post was at 14:41 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary L View Post
Which you have to question why these drugs costs so much.

is it because the ingredients have been specially collected from a far away galaxy where no man has ventured before?

in other words. could these 'expensive' drugs be sold for £5 a pop in the real world. if you take greed and profit out of it?
The development costs are massive, Gary, and of the drugs trialled only a fraction actually make it out to the marketplace.

Producing them tends to be pretty cheap, it's the massive investment in research and development the prices have to recoup, and they have to recoup them before the drugs become generic.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote