Thread: A Duty To Die?
View Single Post
Old 20-05-2015, 11:18   #192
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: A Duty To Die?

I had not actually read your post before this one, however a comment on that article says what I would have.

Quote:
n1cky, Lowestoft, United Kingdom, 10 months ago
The number of deaths by euthanasia is irrelevant. As long as they are being carried out adhering to legislation and with the appropriate levels in place to safeguard mentally or emotionally vulnerable individuals then whatever the number it is is the right number.

The comment about it becoming the standard death for terminally ill cancer sufferers means that it is doing what it was intended to do, allowing them to die a more peaceful and less painful death. Allowing cancer to run its course is horrific in the final stages!
The last year of life is a huge proportion of a person's entire lifetime's healthcare bill. It's one of the key places where lack of funding of the NHS will manifest unfortunately.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote