Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
That's what I am wondering. People talking of Arsenal as well as City and I can't see the logic. What on earth do we need another attacking midfielder for? I don't think Sterling is so good that he merits blowing transfer money on a position in which we're already strong. Might as well keep Walcott. You should only buy players in positions for which you're already well stocked if they are a big improvement in quality, like we did for Sanchez, not for what is arguably a minor upgrade on Walcott......
I find it very hard to judge players outside of Arsenal unless they're obviously very, very good. I don't watch enough football so only end up seeing the likes of Sterling a couple or so times a season. He hasn't made a big impression on me in that limited viewing.
|
Arsenal caved in last time out when Theos contract was up for renewal what will it be this time? A major upgrade would be Reus. Having said that Theo departing would be a loss of pace even if you consider Gnabry as a replacement, Sterling would throw pace back in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
I don't think things will go back to the way they were. We won't have to wait long to see at least
|
FFP will be milked at administration level. It's the 'in' thing for them at the governing bodies by that I mean money being poured in vs management of said monies. To do the sensible thing and rewrite FFP instead of making slight adjustments each year is pointless for them. What ever will they do instead. It all looks to be a bit like EU law contradicting or getting in the way of a member of the EU.