Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Too loose a statement. 100% of what?
I'm nitpicking?! Your entire participation in this thread has been nothing but nitpicking.
You're arguing about un-noticeably minute amounts of loss on somebody else's connection while your own connection is suffering far more corruption. Shouldn't you be off complaining to VM about your "unacceptable" levels of packet loss which "must" be "service affecting" because it's ten times higher than Jon22's?
[SEPH]: What are you on about? Where does my connection come into it, which happens to be post-RS error free?
Here's a few articles you might want to read in order to get clued up on the sort of applications that really cannot tolerate any packet loss:
<SNIP>
[SEPH]: I'm well aware of applications that are intolerant of packet loss. IP Telephony is likely to be part of VM's future strategy and in addition to resilience measures at the cabinet and possibly within the modem, noise and hence dropped packets will be and thus are now a zero quantum aim.
The post-RS error count is the value under examination and available to VM for investigative purposes. I merely state that the value during normal operations should be zero as it is on mine and on a fair number of those who post up their stats here.
|
Thank you for the red blob. That was quite nasty.