[qasdfdsaq]

Originally Posted by Matt D

Really? Where?

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2015/03/1...ardline-review

THE VERDICT

Battlefield Hardline impressively manages to please several different audiences at once. Its campaign is both a great shooter and a great stealth game, and its typical plot is spiced with interesting characters and sparse but punctual humor

http://www.trustedreviews.com/battle...ardline-review

Pros
Exciting single-player campaign
Interesting stealth and arrest mechanics
Brilliant use of destructible scenery
Gripping multiplayer modes - especially Hotwire

Cons
Not all multiplayer modes play to Battlefield's strengths
Stealth and arrest mechanics can seem ludicrous

http://www.trustedreviews.com/battlefield-4-review

Pros
Good single-player campaign
Impressive multiplayer
Varied and imaginative maps
Huge action set-pieces

Cons
Some maps too large for 24 players (Xbox/PS3 issue only)
Occasionally struggles on old hardware

http://www.gamesradar.com/battlefield-4-review/

AT A GLANCE
Multiplayer is genre-leading, again
Levolution and destruction is amazing
Single-player is much improved...

While solo play still lags behind, it's a big step up from BF3.

http://venturebeat.com/2013/11/29/ba...view/view-all/

After playing the full single-player campaign on the PC and multiplayer as well, I was prepared to rate the game considerably higher than Call of Duty: Ghosts, its chief rival this fall. But I’ve also played the new versions of the game on the PlayStation 4 and on the Xbox One. The graphics look wonderful on those consoles, but the multiplayer service has had a lot of problems.

There are still some advantages that Call of Duty has over Battlefield when it comes to variety and adrenaline combat. But Battlefield 4 has gone a long way toward closing the gap, and it’s a better overall game.