View Single Post
Old 13-04-2015, 17:02   #344
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: 200Mbit coming soon? (According to a survey)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
Why on earth would they want to be stressing non-upgraded areas?

To me that's almost incomprehensible!

Igni will no doubt be onto this shortly.
There are no single upstream areas, must be an issue there.

I'll let VM know - this will both potentially cause issues in the area and skew results.

---------- Post added at 16:02 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------

Okay - you definitely shouldn't be on a single upstream channel. That is not acceptable and is not the correct architecture, it's a fault that should be fixed.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote