View Single Post
Old 01-04-2015, 13:29   #34
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Has VM HQ been taken out by Putin?

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
Bad routing configuration or insufficient fallback capacity would be my guess. Neither coming as a surprise when it comes to VM.

Looks from various people's TBB graphs that many suffered massive latency and/or moderate packet loss but not a complete connectivity loss.
Fibre break exacerbated by loss of a backbone router in Brentford. I guess some sites lost all their resilient paths and others lost a bunch of capacity due to the loss of part of the backbone ring between Cardiff and Birmingham along with some of the transport network in the same fibre bundle.

---------- Post added at 14:29 ---------- Previous post was at 14:28 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
It was a fibre break affecting multiple ISP's. Move along.
Yes - it affected them because they were using VM's fibre
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote