View Single Post
Old 18-03-2015, 19:50   #75
Ramrod
Inactive
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 58
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Oooh, look. Half a million more people claiming housing benefit under coalition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
However, this often leaves benefit claimants with the dregs that nobody else wants.
........and? So what? Are you honestly suggesting that people on benefits should expect to live in the same quality housing (ie. location/build quality/same quality mod cons) as someone who is self funding and actually paying their way? Where is the incentive to work harder/get training etc & how is that fair on people who earn a 'decent' wage?
(Excluding the disabled, who we should bend over backwards for)
Quote:
I don't think that this is any good for society as a whole, particularly with all the hot air that polticians spout on about "The Big Society", " Social inclusion" etc.
Oh please.

---------- Post added at 20:39 ---------- Previous post was at 20:27 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
It's not about not liking Labour - the facts speak for themselves - 13 years in office with a majority as opposed to 5 in coalition picking up the pieces of the biggest bust for decades.

Needed saying

---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy View Post
How is the market deciding anything when the playing field isn't level, the market has decided enough houses aren't being built but that's ignored
Thats not being ignored, we all acknowledge that more houses need to be built, price bubbles aren't good etc...but the fact (that you ignored in my post) remains: Private rents are very closely alligned to the other rents being charged in an area which in turn are spookily closely aligned to house prices, mortgage rates, tax rates etc. It's almost as if rents are dictated by external financial forces, not simply landlords whims

---------- Post added at 20:50 ---------- Previous post was at 20:48 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary L View Post
Rubbish, garbage and trash.
Much like your post
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote