Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
It doesn't. By definition, such people would not be classed as disabled, so would be claiming JSA. As such, they wouldn't be entitled to Housing Benefit under this reform of the regulations, despite it not being appropriate for them to be able or expected to remain with their former caregivers.
.
|
Which is the whole point ,if an adult is not disabled and does not have children they would not qualify for HB,that is where the line is drawn because there is not a never ending supply of money to pay everybody
Quote:
|
I am trying to impress on you that your flippant and crass casual remarks about suicide and deoression are wrong and to get you to think a little more about such matters. When people make casual uneducated remarks about others, it's often useful to get them to think about how they would feel if it happened to them or someone close to them
|
What flippant and crass remarks ,be so kind as to point them out
---------- Post added at 18:41 ---------- Previous post was at 18:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Someone coming out of care, someone thrown out of their home because of their sexuality and someone who was sexually abused as a child would not qualify under this proposed scheme.
Unless these situations resulted in physical or mental incapacity to the point of not being able to work, the people in the examples given would be in receipt of Jobseekers Allowance if they were unable to secure employment.
|
People coming out of care would be adults ,people abused as children grow up and become adults ,non disabled adults are expected to look after themselves