View Single Post
Old 15-03-2015, 12:36   #24
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittmann View Post
Come off it. Sandboxie is not designed for complex commercial use.
Once again your claims directly contradict what Sandboxie say on their own homepage:

MOD EDIT - Image too large, added it as an attachment instead


---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:26 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittmann View Post
OSandboxie is right for every private user and there is nobody that can seriously criticise the security of the program
Homeopathic "doctors" could benefit from a (diluted) dose of your marketing prowess.

Based on Hugh's statement above, if it's right for every private user, why do no consumer computing stores sell it? Why do no consumer laptop manufacturers preload it? Why does any laptop a "private user" buys come preinstalled with <insert any major antivirus here> and not Sandboxie?

Seems you can't stand your grandiose delusions about your favourite application being questioned. All you've done is tried to insult me several times but so far you've failed to substantiate a single one of your claims.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittmann View Post
which they have not the guts to do on the Sandboxie Forum.
A bit hypocritical don't you think? Seeing as you've not got the guts to defend any of your claims right here, where you made them?

---------- Post added at 13:36 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
"Lose out on absolute security for convenience of operation"?

Have you any idea the scale of inconvenience/disruption that would occur if a major corporate/institution had a breach of security, and their excuse to the auditors/ICO was that they didn't have the best security "for convenience of operation"?

Have you ever had to support / manage on a Corporate scale?
Indeed, the fact that reality is the exact opposite of what the OP claims shouldn't come as a surprise at this point

Corporates almost always choose to lose out on convenience of operation in the pursuit of absolute security. Not that such a thing as "absolute" security exists.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sb.jpg (125.1 KB, 13 views)
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote