Thread: Redundant
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2015, 17:32   #26
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: Redundant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hom3r View Post
The hardest thing about CVs is 1 to 2 pages.

My qualifications take up 3/4 of a page, so I can just scrape 3 pages.

One VERY important thing Spelling & Grammar, get someone to double/triple check, spelling mistakes will get your CV binned quicker than you can blink, grammer as (there their & they're) as an example.
Which is just one reason why the notion of sticking rigidly to some arbitrary number of pages is nonsense. Is 2 pages of garbage more persuasive than 3 pages of relevant and persuasive information? Is a 1 page CV of 1000 words longer than a 3 page CV of 900 words? I think not.

A CV should be long enough to 'say what needs to be said' and some people have done a lot more than others, irrespective of age. The knack is presenting the content in a form which is easily navigable, thereby empowering any reader to scan it then dip in/out as they see fit, according to what interests them most. If you can catch the reader's eye with some impressive facts, achievements, successes etc., so much the better. A CV should be more akin to a reference document with an element of marketing than a novel.
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote