View Single Post
Old 01-03-2015, 08:46   #109
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Richard Dawkins says children need to be ‘protected’ from religion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
If you can suggest a way for me to do so then by all means. The example you're referring to is where someone is calling their perception a fact and the proof requested could be provided with verifiable links.
You really don't get analogies, do you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
I can't quite see where I've given my perception - and short of asking him to come on CF to verify what I've said I'm not sure what evidence you'd like (although going on the above I get the impression if he did people would still want more proof..).


---------- Post added at 09:40 ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 ----------



Dawkins' purpose of that book was to get people to lose their belief. He put a lot of effort in to that and being the intelligent man he is, he succeeded in imposing it on a lot of people.
Ask him to do that and, assuming he does and is prepared to provide certifiable facts to verify what you have said then I, personally, would expect that I wouldn't require much if anything more than that . That said, others on CF might have higher thresholds when it comes to proof than I.

On the matter of the Dawkins book it is worth pointing out that he is an individual. Extremely poweful churches and religions have engaged dozens, if not hundreds, of people to write and tweak a certain book to influence people. So it's not as if Dawkins was the first to do so, is it?
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote