View Single Post
Old 09-02-2015, 10:12   #96
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Osborne's 'Pensioner bonds' - bribing OAPs with everyone else's money

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk View Post
Agreed. In the meantime the benefit from pensioner bonds is a drop in the ocean imho.
Which isn't, in any way, the point. As far as I'm aware never has been so I apologise for the confusion if I did make it.

It may be a 'drop in the ocean' but it's more than the combined savings of reducing the welfare cap from £26k to £23k and removing housing benefit from 18-21 year olds on JSA.

I rarely do this but I go along with the Tory MP on this one as he put his thoughts in a more erudite way than I can. Giving the impression of taking from the young and poor to give to the older and wealthier isn't good.

It seems an odd position to be against welfare for the poor but be fine with welfare for the relatively wealthy, so long as they are the right age, but each to their own.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote