View Single Post
Old 08-02-2015, 19:49   #89
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,928
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Osborne's 'Pensioner bonds' - bribing OAPs with everyone else's money

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk View Post
The comments are swayed by the analysis unlike here where no-one bit on your anti-parental stance. Leave our oldies alone
I agree with Ignitionnet. It's not anti-parental either. It's being against giving one sector of society increased benefits and spending, which is essentially what this is, whilst you're cutting services for others. I don't see the justification giving better than market rate for pensioners' savings when your cutting housing and job seekers allowance for young people.

Labour are often accused of wanting to spend all the time but that's what this is, it's just targeting a different demographic.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote