View Single Post
Old 03-02-2015, 15:32   #8
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Three-person babies technique voted on by MPs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tweetiepooh View Post
Hard question isn't it. I think that this research to aid around 150 couples per year is the worrying part. This technique is to fix a mitochondrial issue and isn't genetic engineering as most people think but what could it allow in the future.
We've been able to genetically engineer humans for a little while. Lovely thought isn't it?

This technique doesn't really allow modification of the DNA in the nucleus, it's transplant of an organelle from a donor to a receiving embryo.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote