Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
Nobody has said you advocate breaking the law ,i have just said that you simply do not get it and the majority of your posts backs that up
And that post says it all really ,you lost the argument so resort to insults
|
I wasn't aware there was an argument to be had given that you haven't actually offered one with any kind of clarity at any point. The total lack of agreement from anyone with what you've said implies that any argument you did have was a fairly weak one.
I think the general gist of what you're saying is that the cartoons shouldn't be republished because of either 1) The repercussions and/or 2) It offends religious sensibilities.
Now if it's the first one there is no logic in this behaviour and, hence, cause and effect are somewhat broken. These nutjobs will always find an excuse. In the case of smaller news organisations it's also projecting cowardice onto them. While I see the point that large news organisations may be vulnerable smaller publications should, in the UK, not be.
If it's the second you're being an illiberal sycophant who appears more concerned with the obsessions of Koran literalists within a couple of flavours of Islam than basic human rights.
Both views are an insult to way more than just me. Contemptible.
EDIT: Incidentally something that's noteworthy is your lack of condemnation of the actions of the terrorists beyond that it was 'way OTT'. Quite the opposite actually, your opinion appears to be that Charlie Hebdo's staff, for want of a better phrase, 'had it coming'.
To borrow a phrase from you 'What a piece of work...'