View Single Post
Old 15-01-2015, 17:08   #24
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Engineer chat about 152++ speeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Bet you as soon as people find out about it, if there area needs upgrades first they will still complain to disconnects, who will then bump them up to the new speed with no concern about the impact on other users in that area.
Haha. Well given it'll need new CPE they may struggle with that a bit

The simple solution is to leave absolutely no option for them to bump people up without the extra channels and higher modulations in place. No 'go ahead' from capacity planning no upgrades in that area - full stop. This is doable on ICOMS.

The issue before was selling the stuff to new customers before uplifts had been completed. Just not doing that this time around will help a ton.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote