Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
It's the classic move when having a debate such as this.
Those that argue for in-action can prove their case for doing nothing, by doing nothing. Even though the potential outcome of doing nothing is very dangerous.
They can then goad those that call for action, to undertake action - even though all we are doing is debating the issue - and if no action is taken they claim victory.
Not putting their money where there mouth is...................
|
That'd be a pretty low thing to do, cheap point scoring over an issue such as this when the bodies are hardly even cold