Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
You take it wrong. I support the right, in a modern and liberal society, for a free press to deliberately antagonise and leave open the possibility of offense for any group.
.
|
Then you are wrong ,that is not and never has been the purpose of free speech or a free press
Quote:
May I also mention that equating 'me and people with my attitude' as being as much a part of the problem as those two terrorists who killed 12 people is an incredibly low and extremely loathsome comment to make.
I would use stronger words but this isn't the place for that.
|
oh i do apologise ,are we getting offended ,well guess what ,given your insistance on our right to free speech .......tough.... deal with it
Quote:
|
Evidently an awful lot of editors across Europe seemed to agree that it was a sign of solidarity given they actually did it, and in the case of some in the UK would have done it had they not, and they admitted this, feared for their staff had they done so.
|
and how will they feel if next week some more of their staff get shot .It's not solidarity it's stupid and completely unnecessary.
Quote:
|
You see this is what you don't get even though I made it quite clear. For me religion isn't something that can't be criticised, parodied and mocked. You may consider it otherwise, I don't, and the law shouldn't.
|
You are completely missing the point .you can of course criticise or mock a religion no one has ever said any different ,what you shouldn't do is deliberately set out to cause offence or insult especially knowing the likely outcome to people you are responsible for and your utter failure to understand that simple concept is what makes you and those with your attitude part of the problem.