Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
100Mb -> 120Mb -> 152Mb was relatively easy. 300Mb / 400Mb not so much.
|
True, but either way they were already well ahead with 100/120 in most areas (as long as you didn't take peak-time congestion into account). Beyond 'pwning BT' there wasn't really any other reason to come up with 152 was there?
Quote:
I'd best pass this on to the guys planning the additional capacity for this year's upgrades with the note that they need to find another ~33%. 
|
Hehe. You and I both know that higher maximum speeds don't result in a proportional increase in utilisation so the actual required capacity will be less than the increase in headline speed.
