Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Or it could be a very knowledgable existing member registering a new alias so that the 'leak' couldn't be traced to him 
They were already #1 in most of their covered areas before they decided to 'go ridiculous' and double BT's headline speed. Clearly 152 was a direct shot at BT/FTTC, so who knows, VM 400 may be a shot at BT's last remaining stronghold, 330Mbps FTTP. |
100Mb -> 120Mb -> 152Mb was relatively easy. 300Mb / 400Mb not so much.
I'd best pass this on to the guys planning the additional capacity for this year's upgrades with the note that they need to find another ~33%.
