View Single Post
Old 04-01-2015, 23:14   #35
Sparkle
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Open Prison, H.M.United Kingdom
Posts: 1,037
Sparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful one
Re: Scientists find 'marker' left by Big Bang

Cold fusion reactor verified by independent researchers.
Article is dated 9th Oct, but have only just seen it this evening.

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...#disqus_thread

As mentioned in the article, the final report was careful not to use LENR (low energy nuclear reaction) as the source of the excess energy, but with hydrogen loaded nickel as fuel, LENR of some form seems by far the most logical explanation. Especially considering that the energy levels recorded far exceed that possible from any chemical source. This leaves a nuclear source, or else something even more far fetched !

If this is true, I can't see why this isn't front page news.
Sparkle is offline   Reply With Quote