Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Inquiry/review - if the information about the tweets is correct then he wouldn't have had a fair trial as NWP denied the tweets existed. If they were correct about that and the tweets are faked in some way and the footage of her walking to the hotel had no relevance to how drunk/sober she was then yes the trial was fair.
|
How do you know if the Tweets would even be admissible as evidence?
It doesn't matter what the review says because the site will just publish something else and we'll be back on here dealing with it all again. The most complete and fair airing on this case was conducted in a court room and he was found guilty. He appealed and the appeal failed. Now the victim is having her credibility questioned by the internet and the only involvement she has is when her identity is published and she has to move for the 5th time.
If the defence has new evidence then the correct place to present it is in court, not a internet website.
Consider for a moment that the court was right and the internet is wrong. Then all this is the hounding of a rape victim.