Originally Posted by Russ

That is without question.

However the basis of his conviction seems to be the fact that she was "too drunk" to give consent. I'm not disputing that as the reason for a rape conviction however the footage of her going in to the hotel seems to show she was capable of walking easily enough.

Then there's the question of what she meant by "winning big", and treating her friend to a holiday and a Mini Cooper. Those messages were not available at the time of the trial, in fact NWP denied they existed.

I'd say questioning her credibility would be sensible in this instance.