Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
It's all irrelevant.
|
I'm glad you're unlikely to be on his jury.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
The place to question her credibility is in court.
|
And he will do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
If he is a victim of circumstance or something other, he shouldn't have got himself into the situation he found himself in.
|
If you want to judge him fine, I'm not interested in that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
If there is good evidence that he has been wrongly convicted, then that evidence, if admissible, can be brought to court otherwise his status doesn't change.
|
I'm sorry did anyone suggest his status has changed?
---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
You're basing this off a internet website set up to protest the guy's innocence. The internet is not a good place to test these claims and it's a very dangerous road to go down to be second guessing a fair trail because of what you've read on the internet.
|
Rather than being something that's just "read from a website" it's offered what appears to be evidence, something I'd expect her or her side to deny if it wasn't true.
When this appeal gets to court I'll respect the decision. If they find the conviction was safe then he'll forever be rightly convicted as a rapist.