Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
WHAT, will people say IF new evidence which wasn't seen at the trial, its on his website. And l have read it.
IF he wins the appeal, and his conviction is quashed, l can see lot of compo coming someones way
|
What IF the tooth fairy says he is innocent? Let's stick with the facts: he was convicted by a jury as per the law of this land.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
I'm guessing you're trolling just to be offensive. Nobody has ever suggested any sort of rape is 'nice' and it's pretty low of you to suggest they have.
Whereas rape is rape as you rightly say, there is a difference between someone having sex with a woman when she's too drunk to remember whether or not she consented, and when she is beaten up, forced to the floor and attacked.
The difference is intent. Can it be proven the former intended to take advantage? In case your habit of putting words in peoples' mouths returns I'll make it clear I'm not suggesting someone in that situation ought to be treated more leniently.
But there is still a difference.
|
ROAR!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
To be fair, good point well made.
|
Thanks Pierre. Not sure we can get
everyone to understand the points being made though...