Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
is it dishonest now to wait for the evidence to emerge before passing judgement on the alleged event .
|
The evidence has emerged and UKIP has acted on it.
The fact that YOU have not seen it isn't relevant. She has committed an act that has resulted in those who have seen it to call her actions "Jaw Dropping" and the UKIP leadership have expelled her from the party.
You're dancing around semantics and that is very much intellectual dishonesty. Again, I shall remember how you have acted in this instance.
Edit: Calling this an "Alleged" incident shows how removed from reality you are. The incident is on tape and will be shown. There is no allegations to be made, and there is evidence on file and seen by those who needed to do so already. Again, just because you haven't seen it doesn't make it any less real.