View Single Post
Old 08-12-2014, 14:57   #55
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Will VM be short for Vodafone Media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
48% according to their own, skewed figures perhaps, the same figures Ofcom refused to include in the latest national study because they were so inaccurate (i.e. unrealistic). 3 have just been on a giant misleading PR rampage all year wrt. 4G. "No extra cost for 4G" - then increase everyone's bills and increase new customer prices by up to 60%. "4G launching December 2013" - but not actually available to customers until the end of February 2014. "Only network to offer unlimited data on 4G" - and then apply new data limits to everyone, including 3G customers...

Compare their 48% coverage with two 4G transmitters in Aberdeen vs. O2/VF's 48% coverage with 20 4G transmitters in Aberdeen... (Correction: O2/VF are probably closer to 60% now)



Their strategy isn't much different across the whole UK - stick one or two transmitters up in a big city where there's lots of people and call it "covered"... Things don't get much better in central Scotland; O2 have more 4G transmitters in Edinburgh alone than 3 have in the entirety of Scotland combined.:



And it's pretty much the same even at the opposite end of the UK. I'm willing to bet O2 have more 4G transmitters in Scotland (pop: 5 million) than 3 have in the whole of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (pop: 50 million):


---------- Post added at 14:55 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Well not with Vodafone you can't.
That's true, Vodafone do have the worst 3G coverage in the UK. But regardless, they are expanding fast, and 4G will result in much improved 3G coverage even on VF.

Quote:
I wasn't comparing, just making a statement.
My apologies. Still, it's a bit counterproductive as there are already so many people mislead into thinking along the lines "why don't they fix 3G first"/"I can't get 3G, 4G is totally irrelevant"/"I can't get 3G so I'll never get 4G" etc.

Most people don't realise that 4G not only covers more area than 3G and is easier/faster to roll out, the combined multi-mode 2G+3G+4G equipment mans all masts are being upgraded to support both 3G and 4G at the same time, even when they have previously been 2G only.

---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:55 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
It might put it in line with VF/O2 but surely not in line with EE with 80% coverage?
Not even then - my figures for VF/O2 were a bit outdated, they had already reached 51% in October and are closer to 60% now, a good dozen or so new cities went live in early November.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote