View Single Post
Old 07-12-2014, 20:59   #48
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Will VM be short for Vodafone Media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
It's true that Three's 4G coverage doesn't come close to EE's but at least from my anecdotal evidence, it's about on par with O2's as we were all comparing 4G signals last night. Nobody was on Vodafone so I have no idea where they stand.
Three's 4G coverage is considerably poorer than O2 or Vodafone. This is according to Ofcom, and their own coverage maps.

O2 and Vodafone are practically identical, they share all their 4G masts. EE are nearing 80% population coverage, O2/VF are nearing 50%, even so they are better than EE across pretty much the whole of Scotland. Three are still hovering around 20-30%.

---------- Post added at 20:59 ---------- Previous post was at 20:58 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by jb66 View Post
Threes 3g can outperform 4g on other networks
O2's 3G can outperform Three's 4G too. I can also jump from a plane and survive without a parachute.

It just doesn't happen all that often. None of the above things do.

On average, Three's 3G is four times slower than 4G on other networks.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote